An 8-tube module from a 1954 IBM mainframe examined: it's a key debouncer

IBM's vacuum tube computers of the 1950s were built from pluggable modules, each holding eight tubes and the associated components. I recently came across one of these modules so I studied its circuitry. This particular module implements five contact debouncing circuits, used to clean up input from a key or relay. When you press a key, the metal contacts tend to bounce a bit before closing, so you end up with multiple open/closed signals, rather than a nice, clean signal. The signal needs to be "debounced" to remove the extra transitions before being processed by a computer. (Perhaps you have used a cheap keyboard that sometimes gives you duplicated letters; excessive key bounce causes this.)

Front of an IBM tube module. This module contains five key debouncing circuits.

The module is apparently from an IBM 705, a powerful business computer introduced in 1954.1 The 705 was a big computer, weighing 16 tons. It contained 1700 vacuum tubes and consumed 70 kilowatts of power, with 40 tons2 of air conditioning to take away the heat from the tubes. A typical system cost $1,640,000 ($15 million in 2017 dollars), but was normally rented monthly for $33,500 ($300,000 in 2017 dollars). A few dozen 705 systems were built, mostly used by large companies and the US government. 8

The CPU of an IBM 705 was a massive unit. Photo from Farmers Insurance, showing their first computer.

IBM introduced multi-tube pluggable modules in 1953 as part of the 700 series of computers.3 Pluggable modules were an innovation that simplified manufacturing and maintenance, as well as providing a way to pack circuitry densely. Computers were built from hundreds of pluggable modules of many different types. The photo below shows how the 8-tube modules were packed in the IBM 709.

Closeup of tube modules in the IBM 709. Note that the modules are installed "sideways" with the tubes horizontal.

IBM hoped that they could manufacture a small set of common pluggable modules, but this didn't work out since the computers required many different types of modules. Instead, IBM settled for modules that were built from standardized design rules and circuits. The main circuit classes were the inverter, the flip flop (which IBM called a "trigger"), diode logic,6 the multivibrator (pulse generator), and the cathode follower (buffer).75 Unfortunately even this level of standardization didn't work too well. For instance, they ended up with dozens of different types of inverters for special cases, everything from an "Open-filament neon inverter" to a "Line capacity yanker". Thus, each computer ended up with hundreds of different types of tube modules, built from a multitude of circuits.4

A single tube module could contain a couple dozen of these simple circuits. You might wonder how eight tubes could support so many circuits, but there were two factors. First, the tubes were typically dual triodes in one package, so the module had the equivalent of 16 simple tubes. Also, AND and OR logic gates were implemented in the module with compact semiconductor diodes, so complex Boolean logic could be implemented almost for free.

I've seen claims that an 8-tube module represents an 8-bit byte, but that's not the case. The eight tubes don't generally map onto eight of anything since functions can take more or less than one tube. For instance, the module I examined contains five circuits. I have another module that stored three bits. Also, the byte wasn't a thing back then. These computers used 36-bit words (scientific models), or 6-bit characters (business models) so 8 bits was irrelevant.

Vacuum tubes

This module was built from a type of vacuum tube known as a triode. In a triode, electrons flow from the cathode to the plate (or anode), under the control of the grid. The heater, similar to a light bulb filament, heats the cathode to around 1000°F, causing electrons to "boil" off the cathode. The anode has a large positive voltage (e.g. +140V), which attracts the negatively-charged electrons. The grid is placed between the cathode and the anode. If the grid is negative, it repels the electrons, blocking the flow to the plate. Thus, the triode can act as a switch, with the grid turning on and off the flow of electrons. The module I examined used dual triode tubes, combining two triodes into one tube for compactness. 9

Schematic symbol for a triode tube

Vacuum tubes required inconveniently large voltages; this module used -130V. -60V, +140V and 6.3VAC. Tubes also had high power consumption—note the many large (1 watt) resistors in the module. The filament was hot enough to glow, using a couple watts per tube. In total, each tube module probably used dozens of watts of power.

A 5965 vacuum tube from the module. The pins plug into a socket on top of the tube module. This tube is a dual-triode; the two plate structures are visible.

The module's circuitry

I closely examined the tube module and found that it consisted of five copies of the same circuit. I traced out one of these circuits, which was a bit inconvenient because the module has components on both the front and the back. I came across a manual of 700-series circuits, and found a circuit that was an exact match, down to the values of the resistors. The circuit is called a "Contact-Operated Trigger" and was used to interface a mechanical input (key, relay, or cam) to electronic circuits.1

Schematic of one "trigger" circuit of the tube module.

The schematic above shows one of the trigger stages. The basic idea of this circuit is a resistor-capacitor filter (left) smooths out the input, removing any short glitches. This signal goes through two inverter circuits, creating a sharp output. Both inverters are part of the same 6211 tube and are wired as a Schmitt trigger.12 To understand how the inverter works, when the input (pin 2) is high, the current through the tube pulls the plate (pin 1) low. Conversely, when the input is low, the electron flow is blocked and the resistors pull the plate high.10 The output from the first inverter (plate, pin 1) is fed into the second inverter (grid, pin 7). This inverter works similarly, with its output on pin 6. The final output is buffered by a "cathode follower" circuit (not shown) to drive other modules. It also drives a neon bulb for a status indicator,

The tube module showing how the five debounce triggers are divided among the tubes.

The tube module contains five of the above debounce circuits. The diagram above shows how these circuits map onto the eight tubes. Each cathode follower (CF) uses half a tube so one tube implements two cathode followers.11

One amusing component I found in the tube module was "Vitamin Q" capacitors. Presumably this is related to the quality factor or Q factor in radio, and these capacitors were designed to improve the Q.

A Vitamin Q capacitor in an IBM 705 tube module.

A brief history of vacuum tube computing, with a focus on IBM

It took longer to get from the invention of the vacuum tube to the development of electronic computer than you might expect. The triode vacuum tube was invented in 1907 and started being used for radio in 1912. The vacuum tube flip-flop, able to store one bit of data was invented by Eccles and Jordan in 1918, but it wasn't until about 1937 that flip flops were connected together into binary counters.

IBM started investigating vacuum tube counters for calculations in 1941 and built an experimental vacuum tube multiplier in 1942. In 1948, IBM introduced the IBM 604 "Electronic Calculating Punch", which implemented high-speed arithmetic operations for punch-card systems by using vacuum tubes. It was IBM's first product with pluggable tube units, using simple modules with one or two vacuum tubes in each module (as seen below).14

Two tube modules from the IBM 604. By Jud McCranie CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Meanwhile, vacuum tube computers were being invented, with Atanasoff's linear equation solver built in 1942 and the Colossus codebreaking system in 1943. But it wasn't until the programmable ENIAC computer was announced in 1946 that the vacuum tube computer revolution really started, leading to the development of numerous computers by the early 1950s.

In 1952, announced the 701, IBM's first commercial scientific computer. The 701 introduced multi-tube pluggable modules, the focus of this article. These modules were used in the 700-series computers until they were obsoleted in 1958 by IBM's transistorized 7000-series computers, which used germanium transistors. The transistorized computers were built from printed circuit boards the size of a playing card, called SMS cards.13 Thus, although vacuum tube computers were highly influential, their lifespan was short. (Transistorized computers also had a short lifespan of a bit over a decade. Integrated circuits, on the other hand, have been powering computers for more than 50 years, with no signs of being replaced.)

A tube module implements more logic than an SMS card, but the cards are much smaller and use less power. Photo shows a "DGT" SMS card implementing four AND gates on top of a different tube module.

How the modules are built

One important advantage of the tube module is the circuitry is somewhat three-dimensional, compared to components soldered on a circuit board. This allows the circuitry to more efficiently fill the volume of the computer. The module has four layers of contact boards with terminal strips attached, allowing four vertical layers of components (resistors, capacitors, etc) to be soldered to the terminal strips.5 The solder terminals are connected together by thin horizontal metal strips, which can be cut. Thus, neighboring tabs can be electrically connected or not, as required by the circuit. Jumper wires are used to provide additional connections as needed.

The module has four levels of components between the tubes and the connector. In addition, there are components on the front and back of the module.

The tube module has 64 metal contact tabs at the bottom, providing connections for power and signals. The tube module doesn't simply plug into the socket as you might expect, but uses a two step mechanism. First, the module is placed in the socket but the pins don't make contact. You may have noticed the rod sticking up from the top of the module. To lock the module into place, the rod is rotated 180 degrees with a special tool, causing a circular cam at the bottom of the module to rotate. The force of the cam against the socket causes the module to slide sideways so the pins mesh with the socket contacts. This reduces the force required to insert the module and minimizes the risk of the module coming loose.

The module has 64 metal tabs that plug into the socket. The circular cam (rusted) rotates to slide the module (and the tabs) sideways into the socket.

The contacts are carefully positioned to establish the ground connection first, then the negative-voltage connections and finally the positive connections. This allows hot-swapping, replacing a tube module while the system is powered up. (The manual does say, "However, it is wise to drop DC voltages before removing or installing pluggable units.") Interestingly, USB connectors use the same idea. If you look at a USB connector, you'll see that the middle two contacts (data) are shorter than the outside contacts (power and ground), so power and ground connections are established first.

Patent 2,754,454 describes the tube module mechanism in detail.

The tube module has locking tabs that holds the module into place after it slides sideways. I noticed that these tabs are broken off on the module I examined; compare with the intact module below. Probably the rusted cam couldn't be moved, so the module had to be forced out of the socket, breaking the tabs.

When the tube module slides sideways into the connectors, the locking tabs engage to keep it from being pulled out. In this tube module, the locking tabs are broken off.

More evidence of the module's hard life is there are at least four resistors missing from the module, and two resistors with broken solder joints. (This made it considerably harder to figure out what the module did.) Positions where two components are soldered to the same tabs seem especially prone to having a component knocked off. The photo below illustrates one of the missing resistors; one trigger circuit has a 91K (white-brown-orange) resistor soldered across the capacitor, while it is missing in the second circuit.

The arrow shows one of the missing resistors in the tube module.

Conclusion

The tube module is an interesting artifact from the era of vacuum tube computers. Studying it revealed its function, five contact debouncing circuits for use with keys or relays. Part II of this blog post will describe powering up the module and getting it to work. For a sneak preview, you can watch CuriousMarc's video:

Thanks to Carl Claunch for providing the module.

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Notes and references

1. I found the circuit for this module in a manual of circuits for IBM's 700-series computers (page C35). Chapter C has information on circuits for the 702 and 705 business systems (which use different voltages from the scientific 701, 704 and 709 systems described in chapter B). Since the 705 was much more popular than the 702, it's more likely that the module is from a 705. ↩

2. Strangely, a ton of refrigeration means cooling equal to one ton of ice per day, not an air conditioner that weights one ton. This unit probably made more sense in the 1900s when people were switching from ice-based cooling to refrigeration. In more sensible units, one ton of refrigeration is 12,000 BTU/hour or about 3500 Watts. For comparison, a typical window air conditioner is one ton of cooling, while a central home air conditioner is 1.5 to 5 tons of cooling. ↩

3. Several detailed articles on the IBM 701 computer, written by the designers in 1953 are here.  ↩

4. IBM went through a similar failed standardization process in the 1960s with their transistorized Standard Modular System (SMS) cards. They hoped to build computers from a small number of standard cards but ended up with thousands of different cards. ↩

5. IBM's 700 Series Data Processing System Component Circuits provides extremely detailed information on the circuits used in tube modules. If you want to know all about tube modules, this is the document to read. A couple other pages of interest are the IBM 709 CPU Diagrams with schematics of the 709's tube modules and IBM 705 Drawings with a few 705 tube modules. The 1952 patent, Multiple Pluggable Unit, describes the mechanical structure of the tube modules in detail. A few drawings of 705 circuits are here, and 709 drawings are here. Bitsavers has some information on the 704 including details of the circuitry, but not to the tube level. Bitsavers' information on the 701, 702, 705 and 709 is less relevant. ↩

6. The development of the semiconductor diode significantly reduced the size of computers, as small diodes could perform logic functions (AND, OR) that previously required vacuum tubes. The IBM 706 contained many more diodes than vacuum tubes: 4600 germanium diodes versus 1700 vacuum tubes. I think the importance of diodes is underestimated, with people focusing on tubes versus transistors. ↩

7. The tube modules are described in more detail in the book IBM's Early Computers, pages 147-151. ↩

8. The BRL Report has details on most computer systems as of 1961, including the 705. Take a look at this report if you want to know the size, price, features, or number of components in old computers. ↩

9. The module uses two types of vacuum tubes: five 6211 tubes and three 5965 tubes. Both tubes were designed for computer applications, able to handle the stress of constantly turning signals on and off (unlike radio applications, where tubes handled analog signals). They are both dual triodes, but the 5965 is a higher power tube. The 5965 tube is IBM number 317261. The 6211 tube is IBM number 252551. The 5965 tube handles up to 300V, while the 6211 only 200V. The 5965 also handles more current and has higher gain, which is probably why it is used in the cathode follower driver circuit. For full details on the tubes, see the 5965 datasheet and the 6211 datasheet. These tubes are both similar to the more common 12AT7 tube. ↩

10. The various resistors adjust (biasing) the voltage levels from the high plate voltage to the lower voltages used by the grid. (That's why the -130V supply is needed, to pull the voltage down enough.) ↩

11. The triggers are implemented with type 6211 tubes, while the cathode followers are implemented with the more powerful 5965 tubes. From the photo, it may appear that the tubes don't match the locations since there are four tubes with metallized tops and four tubes with metallized sides. However, the tube markings indicate that all tubes were in the right locations. The location of the shiny getter is independent of the tube type. ↩

12. The tube is wired as a Schmitt trigger. When the input becomes sufficiently high, it will rapidly switch to the on state. The input will need to fall to a lower level, at which point it will rapidly switch to the off state. The key to the Schmitt trigger is the resistor connected to the cathodes. When one tube turns on, the voltage drop across the resistor will raise the the cathode voltage close to the grid voltage. This will force the other tube off. You can also look at it as a differential amplifier, where the higher grid "wins". ↩

13. If you want a quick summary of IBM's machines from the 701 through the 370, see The Architecture of IBM's Early Computers and "System/360 and Beyond". ↩

14. The book IBM's Early Computers has extremely detailed information on IBM's pre-360 machines. Also see IBM's web page on the 603. ↩

Repairing a 1960s mainframe: Fixing the IBM 1401's core memory and power supply

A few weeks ago, I wanted to use one of the vintage IBM 1401 mainframe computers at the Computer History Museum, but the computer wasn't working.1 This article describes the multi-week repair process to get the computer working again.

The problem started when the machine was powered up at the same time someone shut down the main power, apparently causing some sort of destructive power transient. The computer's core memory completely stopped working, making the computer unusable. To fix this we had to delve into the depths of the computer's core memory circuitry and the power supplies.

The IBM 1401 computer. The card reader/punch is in the foreground. The 12K memory expansion box is partially visible to the right behind the 1401.

Debugging the core memory

The IBM 1401 was a popular business computer of the early 1960s. It had 4000 characters of internal core memory with additional 12000 characters in an external expansion box.2 Core memory was a popular form of storage in this era as it was relatively fast and inexpensive. Each bit is stored in a tiny magnetized ferrite ring called a core. (If you've ever heard of a "core dump", this is what the term originally referred to.) The photo below is a magnified view of the cores, along with the red wires used to select, read and write the cores.4 The cores are wired in an X-Y grid; to access a particular address, one of the X lines is pulsed and one of the Y lines is pulsed, selecting the core where they intersect.3

Detail of the core memory in the IBM 1401. Each toroidal ferrite core stores one bit.

In the 1401, there are 4000 cores in each grid, forming a core plane that stores 4000 bits. Planes are then stacked up, one for each bit in the word, to form the complete core module, as shown below.

The 4000 character core memory module from an IBM 1401 computer. Tiny ferrite cores are strung on the red wires.

To diagnose the memory problem, the team started probing the 1401 with an oscilloscope. They checked the signals that select the core module, the memory control signals, the incoming addresses, the clock signals and so forth, but everything looked okay.

The next step was to see if the X and Y select signals were being generated properly. These pulses are generated by two boards called "matrix switches", one for the X pulse and one for the Y pulse.5 Some address lines are decoded and fed into the X matrix switch, while the other address lines are decoded and fed into the Y matrix switch. The matrix switches then create pulses on the appropriate X and Y select lines to access the desired address in the core planes.

The photo below shows the core memory module and its supporting circuitry inside the 1401. The core memory module itself is at the bottom, with the two matrix switch boards mounted on it. Above it, three rows of circuit boards (each the size of a playing card) provide the electronics. The top row consists of inhibit drivers (used for writing memory) and the current source and current driver boards (providing current to the matrix switches). The middle row has 17 boards to decode the memory addresses. At the bottom 19 sense amplifier boards read the data signals from the cores. As you can see, core memory requires a lot of supporting electronics and wiring. Also note the heat sinks on most of these boards due to the high currents required by core memory.

Inside the IBM 1401 computer, showing the key components of the core memory system.

After some oscilloscope measurements, we found that one of the matrix switches wasn't generating pulses, which explained why the memory wasn't working. We started checking the signals going into the matrix switch and found one matrix switch input line showed some ringing, apparently enough to keep the matrix switch from functioning.

Since the CHM has two 1401 computers, we decided to swap cards with the good machine to track down the fault. First we tried swapping the thermal switch board (below). One problem with core memory is that the properties of ferrite cores change with temperature. Some computers avoid this problem by heating the core memory to a constant temperature in air (as in the IBM 1620 computer) or an oil bath (as in the IBM 7090). The 1401 on the other hand uses temperature-controlled switches to adjust the current based on the ambient temperature. We swapped the "AKB" thermal switch board (below) and the associated "AKC" resistor board, with no effect.

The core memory uses a thermal switch board to adjust the current through core memory as temperature changes. The switches open at 35°C, 29°C and 22°C. The type of the board (AKB) is stamped into the lower left of the board.

Next we tried swapping the "AQW" current source boards that control current through the matrix switches.6 We swapped these board and the 1401's memory started working. Replacing the original boards one at a time, we found the bad board, shown below.

The IBM 1401 has four "AQW" cards that generate currents for the core memory switches. This card had a faulty inductor (the upper green cylinder), preventing core memory from working.

I examined the bad board and tested its components with an multimeter. There were two 1.2mH inductors on the board (the large green cylinders). I measured 3 ohms across one and 3 megaohms across the other, indicating that the second inductor had failed. With an open inductor, the board would only provide half the current. This explained why the matrix switch wasn't generating pulses, and thus why the core memory didn't work.

I gave the bad inductor to Robert Baruch of Project 5474 for analysis. He found that the connection between the lead and the inductor wire was intermittent. He dissolved the inductor's package in acid and took photographs of the winding inside the inductor.7

The faulty inductor from the IBM 1401 showing the failed connection.

We looked in the spare board cabinet for an AQW board to replace the bad one and found several. However, the replacement boards were different from the original—they had one power transistor instead of two. (Compare the photo below with the photo of the failed card from the computer.)

The replacement AQW card had one transistor instead of two, but was supposedly compatible with the old board.

Despite misgivings from some team members, the bad AQW card was replaced with a one-transistor AQW card and we attempted to power the system back up. Relays clicked and fans spun, but the computer refused to power up. We put the old card back (after replacing the inductor), and the computer still wouldn't start. So now we had a bigger problem. Apparently something had gone wrong with the computer's power supplies so the debugging effort switched focus.

Diagnosing the power supply problem

The power supply system for the IBM 1401 is more complex than you might expect. Curiously, the main power supplies for the system are inside the card reader; a 1250W ferro-resonant transformer in the card reader regulates the line input AC to 130V AC, which is fed to the 1401 computer itself through a thick cable under the floor. Smaller power supplies inside the 1401 then produce the necessary voltages.

Since it was built before switching power supplies became popular, the IBM 1401 uses bulky linear power supplies. The photo below shows (left to right) the +30V, -6V, +6V and -12V supplies.8 In the lower left, under the +30V supply, you can see eight relays for power sequencing. The circuit board to the right of the relays is one of the "sense cards" that checks for proper voltages. Under the +6V supply is a small "+18V differential" supply for the core memory. Foreshadowing: these components will all be important later.9

Power supplies in the IBM 1401.

After measuring voltages on the multiple power supplies, the team concluded that the -6V power supply wasn't working right. This was a bit puzzling because the AQW card (the one we replaced) only uses +12 and +30 volts. Since it doesn't use -6 volts at all, I didn't see how it could mess up the -6 volt supply.

Inside the IBM 1401's -6V power supply.

The team removed the -6V supply and took it to the lab. In the photo above, you can see the heavy AC transformer and large electrolytic capacitors inside the power supply. Measuring the output transistors, they found one bad transistor and some weak transistors and decided to replace all six transistors. In the photo below, you can see the new transistors, mounted on the power supply's large heat sink. These are germanium power transistors; the whole computer is pre-silicon.

The -6V power supply from the IBM 1401 uses six power transistors on a large heat sink.

The -6V power supply tested okay in the lab with the new transistors, so it was installed back in the 1401. We hit the "Power On" button on the console and... it still didn't work. We still weren't getting -6V and the computer wouldn't power up.

In the next repair session, we tried to determine why the computer wasn't powering up. Recall the eight relays mentioned earlier; these relays provide AC power to the power supplies in sequence to ensure that the supplies start up in the right order. If there is a problem with a voltage, the next relay in the sequence won't close and the power-up process will be blocked. We looked at which relays were closing and which weren't, and measured the voltages from the various power supplies. Eventually we determined that about halfway through the power-up process, relay #1 was not closing when it should, stopping the power-up sequence.

Relay #1 was driven by the +30V supply and was activated by a "sense card" that checked the +6V supply. But the +30V and +6V supplies were powering up fine and the sense card was switching on properly. Thus, the problem seemed to be a failure with the relay itself. Just before we pulled out the relay for testing, someone found an updated schematic showing the relay didn't use the regular +30V supply but instead obtained its 30 volts through the "18V differential supply".11 And the schematic for the 18V differential supply had a pencilled-in fuse.10

Could the power problem be as simple as a burnt-out fuse? We opened up the 18V differential supply, and sure enough, there was a fuse and it was burnt out. After replacing the fuse, the system powered up fine and we were back in business.

The 18V differential power supply in the IBM 1401 provides 12 volts to the core memory. The fuse is under the large electrolytic filter capacitors.

With the computer operational, I could finally run my program. After a few bug fixes, my program used the computers's reader/punch to punch a card with a special hole pattern:

A punch card with "Merry Xmas" and a tree punched into it.

Happy holidays everyone!12

Conclusion

After all this debugging, what was the root cause of the problems? As far as we can tell, the original problem was the inductor failure and it's just a coincidence that the problem occurred after the power loss during system startup. The new AQW card must have caused the fuse to blow, although we don't have a smoking gun.13 The reason the -6V power supply wasn't showing any voltage is because it was sequenced by relay #1, which didn't close because of the fuse. The bad transistors in the -6V power supply problem were apparently a pre-existing and non-critical problem; the good transistors handled enough load to keep the power supply working. The moral from all this is that keeping an old computer running is challenging and takes a talented team.

Thanks to Robert Baruch for the inductor photos. Thanks to Carl Claunch for providing analysis. The Computer History Museum in Mountain View runs demonstrations of the IBM 1401 on Wednesdays and Saturdays so check it out if you're in the area; the demo schedule is here.

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Notes and references

1. Although there are two IBM 1401 computers at the CHM, only one of them has the "column binary punch" feature that I needed. "Column binary" lets you punch arbitrary patterns on a punch card (to store binary) rather than being limited to the standard punch card character set of 64 characters. ↩

2. Note that the 1401 has 4000 characters of memory and not 4096 because it is a decimal machine. Also, the memory stores 6-bit characters plus a (metadata) word mark and not bytes. ↩

3. If you want to know more about the 1401's core memory, I've written in detail about core memory and described a core memory fix . ↩

4. The trick that makes core memory work is that the cores have extremely nonlinear magnetic characteristics. If you pass a current (call it I) through a wire through a core, the core will become magnetized in that direction. But if you pass a smaller current (I/2) through a wire, the core doesn't change magnetization at all. The result is that you can put cores on a grid of X and Y wires. If you put current I/2 through an X wire and current I/2 through a Y wire, the core at their intersection will get enough current to change state, while the rest of the cores will remain unchanged. Thus, individual cores can be selected. ↩

5. The matrix switch is another set of cores in a grid, but used to generate pulses rather than store data. The 1401's memory has 50 X lines and 80 Y lines (yielding 4000 addresses), so generating the X and Y pulses with transistors would require 50 + 80 expensive, high-current transistors. The X matrix switch has 5 row inputs and 10 column inputs, and 50 outputs—one from each core. The address is decoded to generate the current pulses for these 15 inputs. Thus, instead of using transistor circuits to decode and drive 50 lines, just 15 lines need to be decoded and driven, and the matrix switch generates the final 50 lines from these. The Y lines are similar, using a second matrix switch to drive the 80 Y lines. ↩

6. Each matrix switch has two current inputs (for the row select and the column select), so there are four current source boards and four current driver boards in total. ↩

7. Strangely, half the inductor is nicely wound while the winding in the other half is kind of a mess.

   ↩

   The faulty inductor from the IBM 1401.

8. The 1401 has more power supplies that aren't visible in the picture. They are behind the power supplies in the photo and slide out from the side for maintenance. ↩

9. If you want to see the original schematics and diagrams of the 1401's power supplies, you can find them here. Core memory schematics are here. ↩

10. The pencilled-in fused on the schematic also had a note about an IBM "engineering change". In IBM lingo, an engineering change is a modification to the design to fix a problem. Thus, it appears the the 1401 originally didn't have the fuse, but it was added later. Perhaps we weren't the first installation to have this problem, and the fuse was added to prevent more serious damage. ↩

11. The 18V differential supply provides 12 volts. This seemed contradictory, but there's an explanation. The core memory circuitry is referenced to +30 volts. It needs a supply 18 volts lower, which is provided by the 18V differential supply. Thus, the voltage is +12V above ground. Unlike the regular +12V power supply, however, the differential power supply's output will move with any changes to the +30V supply, ensuring the difference is a steady 18 volts. ↩

12. The "Merry Xmas" card was inspired by a tweet from @rrragan. (I had also designed a card with a menorah, but unfortunately encountered keypunch problems and couldn't get it completed in time. Maybe next year.) Punch cards normally encode characters by punching up to three holes per column. Since this decorative card required many holes per column, I needed to use the 1401's column binary feature, which allows arbitrary binary data to be punched. I ended up punching the card upside down to simplify the program:

    ↩

    Front of my "Merry Xmas" punch card.

13. After carefully examining the AQW boards, we determined that one- and two-transistor cards should be compatible. The two-transistor board had the two transistors in parallel, probably using earlier transistors that couldn't handle as much current. It's possible that the filter capacitor between +30V and ground was shorted in the replacement AQW board, blowing the fuse. ↩

Repairing a 1960s-era IBM keypunch: controlled by mechanical tabs and bars

In this article I describe repairing an IBM 029 keypunch that wouldn't punch numbers. Keypunches were a vital component of punch card computing, recording data as holes in an 80-column card. Although keypunches have a long history, dating back to the use of punch cards in the 1890s, the IBM 029 keypunch is slightly more modern, introduced in 1964. The repair turned out to be simple, but in the process I learned about the complex mechanical process keypunches used to encode characters.

Keyboard of an IBM 029 keypunch. "Numeric" key is in the lower left. Strangely, this keyboard labels most special characters with the holes that are punched (e.g. 12-8-6) rather than the character. Compare with the photo of a different 029 keyboard later.

A couple weeks ago, I was using the 029 keypunch in the Computer History Museum's 1401 demo room and I found that numbers weren't punching correctly. The keyboard has a "Numeric" key that you press to punch a number or special character. (Unlike modern keyboards with a row of numbers at the top, numbers on the 029 keyboard share keys with letters.) When I tried to type a number, I got the corresponding letter; the keypunch was ignoring the "Numeric" key. The same happened with special characters that required "Numeric".

Frank King, an expert on repairing vintage IBM computers, showed me how to fix the keyboard. The first step was to remove the keyboard from the desk. This was surprisingly easy—you just rotate the keyboard clockwise and lift it up.

The keyboard of an IBM 029 keypunch can be removed from the desk simply by rotating and lifting.

On the underside of the keyboard are several microswitches for some special function keys. The microswitches are on the left half, connected by blue wires. Also note the metal rectangles along the right; these are the "latch contacts", one for each key and will be discussed later.

The underside of the IBM 029 keypunch's keyboard.

Frank noticed that the keystem for the "Numeric" key wasn't pressing the microswitch, but was out of alignment and missing the microswitch's lever entirely. Thus, pressing the "Numeric" key had no effect and the wrong character was getting punched. He simply rotated the microswitch slightly so it was back into alignment with the keystem, fixing the problem. We placed the keyboard back into the desk and the keypunch was back in business. Many vintage computer repairs are difficult, but this one was quick and easy.

How the keypunch encodes characters

This repair was a good opportunity to look inside the keyboard and study the interesting techniques it uses to encode characters. On a punch card, each character is indicated by the holes punched in one of the card's 80 columns, as shown below. The digits 0 through 9 simply result in a punch in row 0 through 9. Letters are indicated by a punch in digit rows 1 through 9 combined with a punch in one of the top three rows (the "zone" rows1). Special characters usually use three punches. Since each character can have punches in any of 12 rows, you can think of cards as using a (mostly-sparse) 12-bit encoding.

An 80-column punch card stores one character in each column. The pattern of holes in the column indicates the character. From the 029 Reference Manual.

Since each key on the keyboard has one character in alpha mode and another character in numeric mode, the keypunch must somehow determine the hole pattern for each character. With modern technology, you could simply use a tiny ROM to hold a 12-bit row value for the "alpha" mode and a second 12-bit value for the "numeric" mode. (Or use a keyboard encoding chip, digital logic, a microcontroller, etc.) But back in the keypunch era, ROMs weren't available. Instead, the keypunch uses a complex but clever mechanical technique to assign a hole pattern to each character.

The previous model: the 026 keypunch

IBM 026 keypunch. Photo by Paul Sullivan (CC BY-ND 2.0).

Before explaining how the 029 keypunch encodes characters, I'll discuss the earlier and simpler IBM 026 keypunch, which was introduced in July 1949. The 026 used the technology of the 1940s: vacuum tubes and electromechanical relays. Encoding the hole pattern with tubes or relays would be bulky and expensive. Instead, the keypunch used a mechanical encoder with metal tabs to indicate where to punch holes.

The keyboard mechanism in the 026/029 keypunch. Pressing a key pulls the latch pull-bar. This causes the permutation bar to drop slightly. If a bail has a matching tab, the permutation bar will move the bail, closing the contact. The permutation bar also closes the key's latch contact. Based on the Maintenance Manual.

The diagram above shows the keyboard mechanism in the keypunch. The basic idea is there are 12 "bail contacts" (one for each row on the card); when you press a key, the appropriate contacts are closed to punch holes in the desired rows. To implement this, each key was connected to a separate vertical "permutation bar" by a "latch pull-bar". When a key is pressed, the associated permutation bar drops down. Twelve horizontal bars, called "bails",2 ran perpendicular to the permutation bars, one bail for each row on the card. At each point where a bail crossed a key's permutation bar, the bail could have a protruding tab that meshes with the permutation bar. Pressing a key would cause the permutation bar to push the tab and rotate the bail, closing the bail contact and punching a hole in that row. Thus, the 12 bails mechanically encoded the mapping from keys to holes by the presence or absence of metal tabs along their length.

Closeup of the bails and one of the permutation bars. Four of the bails have tabs and will be triggered by the permutation bar.

The photo above shows a permutation bar (right) engaging four tabs on the bails (left). In the photo below, you can see one of the bails removed from the keyboard mechanism. Note the tabs extending from the bail to engage with the permutation bars. Also note the contact on the left end of the bail.

The keyboard mechanism in the 029 keypunch. From the Maintenance Manual.

There is a problem with this 12-bail mechanism: it only handles a single character per key, so it doesn't handle numbers. (The keyboard diagram below shows how numbers share keys with letters.) The obvious solution is to add 12 more bails for the second character on a key, but this would double the cost of the mechanism. However, since numbers are indicated by a single punch in a column, a shortcut is possible: use a switch on each number key to punch that row. The 026 keypunch does this, using the latch contacts shown in the earlier diagram. In numeric mode, the latch contact for the "1" key would punch row 1, and so forth for the other numbers. To handle the special characters, three additional bails were added, bringing the total number of bails to 15.5 Thus, the 026 had 12 bails used in alpha mode, 3 bails used in numeric mode for special characters, and a latch contact for each key for numbers and special characters.

Keyboard of the IBM 026 keypunch. From the IBM 24/26 Reference Manual.

The permutation bar and bail mechanism also explains why the "Numeric" key (the one we fixed) has a separate microswitch under the keyboard. The regular mechanism with permutation bars, bails and latch contacts only allows one key to be pressed at a time.3 Since "Numeric" is held down while another key is pressed, it needed a separate mechanism.4

Back to the 029 keypunch

When the 029 keypunch was introduced in 1964, it replaced the 026's vacuum tubes with transistorized circuitry and updated the keypunch's appearance from 1940's streamlining to a modernist design. However, the 029 kept most of the earlier keypunch's internal mechanical components, along with many relays.6

Keyboard from the IBM 029 keypunch. Photo by Carl Claunch.

A major functional improvement over the 026 was the addition of many more special characters in the 029; almost every key on the keyboard had a special character. The three numeric mode bails used in the 026 couldn't support all these special characters. The obvious solution would be to add more bails; with 12 bails for alpha and 12 bails for numeric, any characters could be encoded. But, IBM came up with a solution for the 029 that supported the new special characters while still using the 026's 15-bail mechanical encoder. The trick was to assign the bails to rows in a way that handled most of the holes, leaving the latch contact to handle one additional "extra" hole per key.7

The diagram below shows part of the encoding mechanism, based on the keypunch schematics.8 Horizontal lines correspond to the 15 bails; the labels on the left show the row handled by each bail. Each vertical line represents the permutation bar for a key; the key labels are at the bottom. The black dots correspond to tabs on the bail, causing the bail to tripped when activated by the corresponding key. (The circles symbolize the interlock disks that keep two keys from being used simultaneously.3) Note that the 029's bails don't handle all the rows for alpha mode (unlike the 026), leaving some alpha holes to be punched by the latch contacts.

Diagram showing how keys select holes to be punched on the 029 keypunch. The complete diagram is in the schematic.

The yellow highlights on the diagram show what happens for the "W _" key. Pressing this key (bottom) will activate the "Numeric 5", "Numeric 8" and "Common 0" bails (left). In addition, the latch contact will activate "Alpha 6" (top). Putting this together, in alpha mode, rows 0 and 6 will be punched and in numeric mode, rows 0, 8 and 5 will be punched. These are the codes for "W" and "_" respectively, so the right holes get punched. The encoder works similarly for other keys, punching the appropriate holes in alpha and numeric modes. Thus, the 029 managed to extend the 026's character set with many new special characters, without requiring a redesign of the mechanical encoder.

An IBM 029 keypunch in the middle of punching cards.

Conclusion

For once, repairing computer equipment from the 1960s was quick and easy. Fixing the "Numeric" key didn't even require any tools. The repair did reveal the interesting mechanism used to determine which holes to punch. In the era before inexpensive ROMs, keyboard decoding was done mechanically, with tabs on metal bars indicating which holes to punch. This mechanism was inherited from the earlier 026 keypunch (1949), improved on the 029 keypunch (1964) to handle more symbols, and was finally replaced by electronic encoding when the 129 keypunch was introduced in 1971.6

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Notes and references

1. The card's zone rows are called 12 (on top) and 11 (below 12). Confusingly, sometimes the 0 row acts as a zone (for a letter) and sometime it acts as a digit (for a number). Also note the special characters that use 8 combined with a digit from 2 to 7; essentially this corresponds to a binary value from 10 to 15. The combination of a zone punch and digit punches encoded a 6-bit character. ↩

2. "Bail" may seem like an obscure word in this context, but it's essentially a metal bar. Looking at old patents, in the early 1900s "bail" was most often used to denote a wire handle on a bucket or pot. It then got generalized to a metal bar in various mechanism, especially one that could be lifted up. If you're from the typewriter era, you might remember the "paper bail", the bar that holds the paper down. (Dictionary link.) ↩

3. An interesting mechanism ensures that only one key can be pressed at a time. The keyboard mechanism contains a row of "interlock disks". When a key is pressed the latch bar slides between two of these disks. These disks slide all the other disks over, blocking the path of any other key's latch bar until the first key is released. ↩

4. The other special keys that use a microswitch are "Error reset", "Multi punch", "Dup", "Feed", "Prog 1", "Prog 2" and "Alpha". ↩

5. The 026 keypunch used a clever trick for some of the special characters. Note the four special character keys in the upper left. These characters were carefully assigned so each pair has the same punch except the upper one punches a 3 and the lower punches a 4. Thus, a single encoding worked for the key with the addition of a relay to switch between 3 and 4. ↩

6. In 1964 IBM introduced the IBM 360 line of computers. They were built from hybrid SLT (Solid Logic Technology) modules, an alternative to integrated circuits. Although the IBM 029 keypunch was introduced along with the SLT-based IBM 360, the keypunch used older transistorized SMS boards. Even though the 029 got rid of the 026's vacuum tubes, it was still a generation behind in technology. It wasn't until the 129 keypunch was announced in 1971 (along with the 370 computer line) that keypunches moved to SLT technology.

   The 129's keyboard kept much of the mechanical structure of the older keypunches (the permutation bars and latch contacts), but got rid of the bails used to encode the keypresses. Instead, encoding in the 129 was done through digital logic SLT modules (mostly AND-OR gates) controlled by the latch contact switches. The 026 and 029 keypunches originally had model numbers 26 and 29, but with the introduction of the 129, their names were retconned to the 026 and 029. ↩

7. It's not easy to design a keyboard layout that works with the 029 mechanism since the latch contact can support at most one "extra" hole per key, a hole not handled by the bails. The special characters needed to be assigned to keys in a way that would work; this probably explains the semi-random locations of the special characters on the keyboard. For instance, "(" is on "N" while ")" is on "E". Since both ")" and "E" require a hole in row 5, it made sense to put them on the same key, so the latch contact can handle the 5 punch for both. ↩

8. If you want to learn more about keypunch internals, the manuals are on bitsavers.org. In particular, see the Reference Manual, Maintenance Manual and Schematics. ↩

Creating a Christmas card on a vintage IBM 1401 mainframe

I recently came across a challenge to print a holiday greeting card on a vintage computer, so I decided to make a card on a 1960s IBM 1401 mainframe. The IBM 1401 computer was a low-end business mainframe announced in 1959, and went on to become the most popular computer of the mid-1960s, with more than 10,000 systems in use. The 1401's rental price started at $2500 a month (about $20,000 in current dollars), a low price that made it possible for even a medium-sized business to have a computer for payroll, accounting, inventory, and many other tasks. Although the 1401 was an early all-transistorized computer, these weren't silicon transistors—the 1401 used germanium transistors, the technology before silicon. It used magnetic core memory for storage, holding 16,000 characters.

A greeting card with a tree and "Ho Ho Ho" inside, created on the vintage 1401 mainframe. The cards are on top of the 1403 line printer, and the 1401 mainframe is in the background.

You can make a greeting card by printing a page and then folding it into quarters to make a card with text on the front and inside. The problem with a line-printer page is that when you fold it into a card shape, the printed text ends up sideways, so you can't simply print readable text. So I decided to make an image and words with sideways ASCII graphics. (Actually the 1401 predates ASCII and uses a 6-bit BCD-based character set called BCDIC, so it's really BCDIC graphics. (EBCDIC came later, extending BCDIC to 8 bits and adding lower case.)) Originally I wanted to write out "Merry Christmas", but there aren't enough characters on a page to make the word "Chrstmas" readable, so I settled on a cheery "Ho Ho Ho". I figured out how to sideways draw a tree and the words, making this file.

Closeup of a greeting card printed on the IBM 1401, with a Christmas tree on the front.

Next, I needed a program to print out this file. I have some experience writing assembly code for the IBM 1401 from my previous projects to perform Bitcoin mining on the 1401 and generate Mandelbrot fractals. So I wrote a short program to read in lines from punched cards and print these lines on the high-speed 1403 line printer. The simple solution would be to read a line from a card, print the line, and repeat until done. Instead, I read the entire page image into memory first, and then print the entire page. The reason is that this allows multiple greeting cards to be printed without reloading and rereading the entire card deck. The second complication is that the printer is 132 columns wide, while the punch cards are 80 columns. Instead of using two punch cards per print line, I encoded cards so a "-" in the first column indicates that the card image should be shifted to the right hand side of the page. (I could compress the data, of course, but I didn't want to go to that much effort.)

The 1401 has a strange architecture, with decimal arithmetic and arbitrary-length words, so I won't explain the above code in detail. I'll just point out that the r instruction reads a card, mcw moves characters, w writes a line to the printer, and bce branches if a character equals the specified value. (See the reference manual for details.)

The next step was to punch the code and data onto cards. Fortunately, I didn't need to type in all the cards by hand. Someone (I think Stan Paddock) attached a USB-controlled relay box to a keypunch, allowing a PC to punch cards.

A PC-controlled IBM 029 keypunch punched my card deck.

A few minutes later I had my deck of 77 punch cards. The program itself just took 9 cards; the remainder of the cards held the lines to print.

The deck of punched cards I ran on the IBM 1401. The first few cards are the program, and the remaining cards hold the lines to print.

Once the cards were ready, we loaded the deck into the card reader and hit "Load", causing the cards to start flying through the card reader at a dozen cards per second. Unfortunately, the reader hit an error and stopped. Apparently the alignment of the holes punched by the keypunch didn't quite match the alignment of the card reader, causing a read error.

The IBM 1401's card reader was experiencing errors, so we removed the brushes and realigned them.

The card reader contains sets of 80 metal brushes (one for each column of the card) that detect the presence of a hole. Computer restoration expert Frank King disassembled the card reader, removed the brush assembly from the card reader and adjusted it.

A closeup of the brush module with 80 brushes that read a card.

After a few tries, we got the card reader to read the program successfully and it started executing. The line printer started rapidly and noisily printing the lines of the card. We had to adjust the line printer's top-of-form a couple times so the card fit on the page, but eventually we got a successful print.

Printing a greeting card on the IBM 1403 line printer.

I ejected the page from the printer, tore it off, and folded the card in quarters, yielding the final greeting card. It was a fun project, but Hallmark still wins on convenience.

Greeting card created by the IBM 1401 mainframe (background).

If you want to know more about the IBM 1401, I've written about its internals here. The Computer History Museum in Mountain View runs demonstrations of the IBM 1401 on Wednesdays and Saturdays. It's amazing that the restoration team was able to get this piece of history working, so if you're in the area you should definitely check it out; the demo schedule is here.

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Identifying the "Early IBM Computer" in a Twitter photo: a 405 Accounting Machine

The photo below of a "woman wiring an early IBM computer" has appeared on Twitter a bunch of times, and it stoked my curiosity: what was the machine in the photo? Was it really an early IBM computer? I was a bit skeptical since the machine in the photo is much smaller than IBM's first room-filling computers, and there aren't any vacuum tubes visible. I investigated this machine and it turned out to be not a computer, but an IBM 405 "Alphabetic Accounting Machine" from 1934, back in the almost forgotten pre-computer age of tabulating machines.1

A common photo on Twitter shows a woman wiring an early IBM computer.

The image is from photographer Berenice Abbott who took many scientific photographs from 1939 to 1958. She photographed everything from basic magnetic field and optics experiments to research on early television tubes, and many of these photos were used in physics textbooks. Her photos (including IBM photos) were published in the book Documenting Science. I had hoped that the book would identify the computer in the photo, but it merely said "IBM Laboratory: Wiring an early IBM computer". Surprisingly for an art book, it didn't even give a date for the photo.

The diagram below shows the back view of an IBM 403 accounting machine, which IBM introduced in 1948.2 (An accounting machine (also called a tabulator) summed up and printed records from punched cards for applications such as payroll or inventory.) Note the similarities with the Abbott photo: the thick laced wire bundles, the vertical wire bundles in the middle for the counters, and the hinged doors that swing open.

Back view of an IBM 403 accounting machine. From the IBM 402/403 Field Engineering Manual.

A second Berenice Abbott photo shows the machine from a slightly different angle.3 The "Card Feed Circuit Breaker Unit" in the upper right looks like a perfect match between the IBM 403 and the Abbott photo. The dangling cables from the counters in the middle look right, as well as the thick cable between the counters and the circuit breaker unit. The 403 diagram above shows a large printing carriage on top, while the Abbott photo just shows a base, presumably because the carriage hadn't been installed yet.

A second photo of "Woman wiring an early IBM computer" by Berenice Abbott.

Although the machine in the Abbott photo looks very similar to the IBM 403, there are a few differences if you look carefully. One clear difference is the IBM 403 had caster wheels attached directly to the frame, while the machine in the photos has stubby curved legs. In addition, the doors of the IBM 403 were hinged at a different place. In the Abbott photos, the doors are attached just to the left of the counters and to the right of the card feed circuit breaker unit. But the IBM 403 has some bulky components to the left of the counters such as the "Bijur pump" (an oil pump), and components on the right such as the drive motor. Overall, the machine in the Abbott photos has a narrower cabinet than the IBM 403. Additionally, the thick cable snaking down between the IBM 403's circuit breaker units appears to go straight down in the photos. Thus, although the machine in the photos is very similar to the IBM 403, it's not an exact match.

After more research into IBM's various accounting machines, I conclude that machine in the photos is the IBM 405, an IBM accounting machine introduced in 1934 (earlier than that 1948 IBM 403 despite the larger model number).4 The IBM 405 (below) had curved legs that match the Abbott photos. In addition, the 405 has a narrower main cabinet than the 403, with bulky additional components attached to the left and right, outside the legs. This matches the narrower cabinet in the Abbott photos. (The 403 was an improved and modernized 405, explaining the overall similarity between the two machines.)

An IBM 405 accounting machine. Photo courtesy of Columbia University Computing History.

Punched cards were a key part of data processing from 1890 until the 1970s, used for accounting, inventory, payroll and many other tasks. Typically, each 80-column punched card held one record, with data stored in fixed fields on the card. The diagram below shows a typical card with columns divided into fields such as date, vendor number, order number and amount. An accounting machine would process these cards: totaling the amounts, and generating a report with subtotals by account and department, as shown below.

Example of a punched card holding a 'unit record', and a report generated from these cards. The accounting machine can group records based on a field to produce subtotals, intermediate totals, and totals. From Manual of Operation.

Punched-card data processing was invented by Herman Hollerith for the 1890 US census, which used a simple tabulating machine to count census data, stored on punched cards. Tabulating machines steadily became more complex, becoming feature-laden "accounting machines" that could generate business reports. Businesses made heavy use of these electromechanical accounting machines and by 1944, IBM had 10,000 tabulating and accounting machines in the field.

Accounting machines were "programmed" with a removable plugboard. By switching the plugboard, an accounting machine could be rapidly reconfigured for different tasks. Each wire corresponded to one character or digit. Wires plugged into the plugboard connected columns on the input card to adders. Each column on the printer had an associated wire controlling what got printed. Other wires had control functions. (I explained the tax preparation plugboard below in detail in this article.)

Plugboard to generate a tax report on an IBM 403 accounting machine. Courtesy of Carl Claunch.

The IBM 405 was IBM's first "Alphabetic Accounting Machine," able to print text as well as numbers. It had more complexity than you might expect from the 1930s, able to generate three levels of subtotals, intermediate totals, and grand totals. It could process up to 150 cards per minute; that's remarkably fast for an electromechanical system, reading and summing more than 2 cards per second. The 405 was IBM's flagship product for many years, with IBM manufacturing 1500 of them per year. Like most IBM machines, the 405 was usually rented rather than purchased; it cost over $1000 a month (equivalent to about $15,000 per month in 2017 dollars). Renting out these machines (and selling the punch cards) was highly profitable for IBM, with the IBM 405 accounting machine called "the most lucrative of all IBM's mechanical glories".5

Amazingly, although accounting machines were designed for business purposes, they were also used for scientific computation in the 1930s and 1940s, before digital computers existed. They solved everything from differential equations and astronomy computations to nuclear bomb simulations for the Manhattan Project.6

How does an accounting machine work and what are all those parts?

Accounting machines (also called tabulators) were built from electromechanical components, rather than transistors or even vacuum tubes. The main components in accounting machines were electromechanical counters and relays. Everything was synchronized to rotating driveshafts that ran the counters, card reader and printer. In a way, accounting machines were more like cars than computers, with a motor, clutches, driveshafts, an oil pump, gears and cams.

Counters

The heart of the accounting machine was the mechanical counter, a digit wheel somewhat like an odometer. Each wheel stored one digit, with the value indicated by the rotational position of the wheel. To add a number, say 3, to the counter, a clutch was briefly activated, causing the drifeshaft to rotate the counter three more positions. Since these counters were adding 2 1/2 numbers per second, they were spinning rapidly with the clutches engaging and disengaging with precision timing. By combining multiple counters, numbers of up to 8 digits could be handled. The counter kept a running total of the numbers fed into it. Since it accumulated these numbers, the counter was known as an accumulator, a term still used in computing.

A counter unit from an IBM accounting machine. The two wheels held two digits. The electromagnets (white) engaged and disengaged the clutch so the wheel would advance the desired number of positions.

The photo above shows a board with two counters: the two wheels on the left stored two digits. The counters are more complex than you might expect, with electromechanical circuits to handle carries (including fast carry lookahead). The clutch is underneath the wheel and is engaged by the metal levers in the photo, controlled by electromagnets. A gear underneath the clutch connects the counter to the driveshaft. The electrical connections on the right control the clutch and allow the values from the counters to be read out. Since the IBM 405 had 16 accumulators, with up to 8 digits, many counters were required, resulting in the mass of counter wires in the photos.

Relays

Another key component of the accounting machine was the relay, an electromagnetic switch. The control logic of the accounting machine was implemented with hundreds of relays, which would turn on and off to direct the various components of the accounting machine. Example relay functions are switching on when punched cards are in the input hopper, selecting addition or subtraction for a counter, generating the final total when all cards are done, or printing a credit symbol for a negative balance.

The back of the IBM 403 accounting machine shows numerous relays, used to control the machine.

The relays were mounted on swing-out panels. The photo above shows an IBM 403 with the panels closed. In the Abbott photos the relay panels are opened and you can see the extensive wiring that connected the relays to the rest of the system.

Circuit breakers

The final component I'll explain is the "circuit breaker," which has nothing to do with the circuit breakers in your house. Instead, these are cam-controlled switches that turned on and off (breaking circuits) as the drive shafts rotated. Dozens of circuit breakers provided the timing signals to the accounting machine, ensuring all operations in the machine were synchronized to the drive shaft. (Every 18° of drive shaft rotation corresponded to reading one row on a punched card, moving one character position on a printer typebar, or advancing a counter wheel by one position.)

Conclusion

The woman in Abbott's photos illustrates the large, but mostly ignored role that women played in electrical manufacturing. Women formed the majority of workers in the 1920s radio manufacturing industry, and their presence in electrical manufacturing increased even more when World War II led many women to take industrial jobs. The famous ENIAC computer (1946) also illustrates this: most of the "wiremen" assembling the ENIAC computer were in fact women, probably recruited from the telephone company or radio assembly.8

The photos also provide a glimpse into the era before digital computers, when businesses used electromechanical accounting machines and tabulators for their data processing. Although you'd expect a machine from 1934 to be primitive, the IBM 405 accounting machine in the photos was an advanced piece of technology for its time, containing 55,000 parts and 75 miles of wire.5 These punched card machines were also capable of performing complex scientific tasks, even contributing to the Manhattan Project. In the 1960s, businesses gradually switched from accounting machines to stored-program business computers such as the IBM 1401. Even so, IBM continued marketing accounting machines until 1976.

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Notes and references

1. By the "era before computers", I mean before digital electronic computers came along in the 1940s. There's a long history of computing machines, analog computers, and human computers (as shown in Hidden Figures) before digital computers came along. Two interesting books that cover this history are The First Computers—History and Architecture or The Computer: From Pascal to von Neumann. ↩

2. IBM's 402 and 403 accounting machines were the same except the 403 could print three-line addresses. This feature was called MLP (multi-line printing) and was useful for printing addresses on invoices, for instance. So when I refer to the IBM 403 accounting machine, I'm also including the IBM 402. ↩

3. I was surprised to realize that there are two different, but nearly identical photos of the woman wiring the IBM machine floating around. In first photo, the woman's right leg is straight, there's a screwdriver in front of the bench and she's wiring the left side of the machine. In the second, the woman's left leg is straight and she's wiring the middle of the machine. ↩

4. I couldn't find any manuals for the IBM 405 or photos of the back of a 405, so I can't totally nail down the identification. There's a possibility that the Abbott photos show an IBM 401 accounting machine (below), which was similar to the 405 but introduced a year earlier. The IBM 401 and IBM 405 both had the same basic shape and arrangement of components. The main difference is 405 had a full cabinet in front while the 401 was empty in the front with a bar bracing the front feet. The Abbott photos seem to show a full cabinet like the 405, rather than the open 401. Also, since the 405 was a much more popular machine than the 401—the 405 was the "flagship of IBM's product line until after World War II"—the photos are most likely the 405.

   ↩

   IBM 401 accounting machine (1933). Photo courtesy of Computer History Museum.

5. Several sources provide information on the IBM 405. One source is Computing before Computers (online) p144. IBM has a FAQ with a short overview. Columbia's Computer History page on the 405 has a longer discussion. Also see IBM's Early Computers, pages 18-22 for information on the IBM 405. Computer: Bit Slices from a Life has some hands-on stories of the IBM 405 (online). Computer: A history of the information machine page 51 has some information on the IBM 405. ↩

6. See Punched Card Methods in Scientific Computation, 1940 for details on how accounting machines were used for scientific computation. The book is by W. J. Eckert, confusingly unrelated to the ENIAC's J. Presper Eckert. The use of IBM accounting machine by the Manhattan Project is described by Feynman in Los Alamos from Below, p25; and in this page. The Manhattan Project used a 402 accounting machine, several IBM 601 multiplying punches for multiplication, and other card equipment (reference, with more details in Early Computing at Los Alamos). ↩

7. Bitsavers has manuals for the later 402/403 accounting machines. The operation of accounting machines is discussed in detail in IBM 402, 403 and 419 Accounting Machines: Manual of Operation. For a thorough discussion of how the machine works internally, see IBM 402, 403, 419 Field Engineering Manual of Instruction. For an overview of how plugboard wiring for IBM's works, see IBM Functional Wiring Principles. ↩

8. Women and Electrical and Electronics Manufacturing provides a detailed discussion of the history of women in technological manufacturing in the 20th century. The book ENIAC in Action describes how most of the wiring of the ENIAC was done by women. It also has a detailed discussion of the role of women as programmers for early computers such as the ENIAC. ↩