Repairing a 1960s mainframe: Fixing the IBM 1401's core memory and power supply

A few weeks ago, I wanted to use one of the vintage IBM 1401 mainframe computers at the Computer History Museum, but the computer wasn't working.1 This article describes the multi-week repair process to get the computer working again.

The problem started when the machine was powered up at the same time someone shut down the main power, apparently causing some sort of destructive power transient. The computer's core memory completely stopped working, making the computer unusable. To fix this we had to delve into the depths of the computer's core memory circuitry and the power supplies.

The IBM 1401 computer. The card reader/punch is in the foreground. The 12K memory expansion box is partially visible to the right behind the 1401.

Debugging the core memory

The IBM 1401 was a popular business computer of the early 1960s. It had 4000 characters of internal core memory with additional 12000 characters in an external expansion box.2 Core memory was a popular form of storage in this era as it was relatively fast and inexpensive. Each bit is stored in a tiny magnetized ferrite ring called a core. (If you've ever heard of a "core dump", this is what the term originally referred to.) The photo below is a magnified view of the cores, along with the red wires used to select, read and write the cores.4 The cores are wired in an X-Y grid; to access a particular address, one of the X lines is pulsed and one of the Y lines is pulsed, selecting the core where they intersect.3

Detail of the core memory in the IBM 1401. Each toroidal ferrite core stores one bit.

In the 1401, there are 4000 cores in each grid, forming a core plane that stores 4000 bits. Planes are then stacked up, one for each bit in the word, to form the complete core module, as shown below.

The 4000 character core memory module from an IBM 1401 computer. Tiny ferrite cores are strung on the red wires.

To diagnose the memory problem, the team started probing the 1401 with an oscilloscope. They checked the signals that select the core module, the memory control signals, the incoming addresses, the clock signals and so forth, but everything looked okay.

The next step was to see if the X and Y select signals were being generated properly. These pulses are generated by two boards called "matrix switches", one for the X pulse and one for the Y pulse.5 Some address lines are decoded and fed into the X matrix switch, while the other address lines are decoded and fed into the Y matrix switch. The matrix switches then create pulses on the appropriate X and Y select lines to access the desired address in the core planes.

The photo below shows the core memory module and its supporting circuitry inside the 1401. The core memory module itself is at the bottom, with the two matrix switch boards mounted on it. Above it, three rows of circuit boards (each the size of a playing card) provide the electronics. The top row consists of inhibit drivers (used for writing memory) and the current source and current driver boards (providing current to the matrix switches). The middle row has 17 boards to decode the memory addresses. At the bottom 19 sense amplifier boards read the data signals from the cores. As you can see, core memory requires a lot of supporting electronics and wiring. Also note the heat sinks on most of these boards due to the high currents required by core memory.

Inside the IBM 1401 computer, showing the key components of the core memory system.

After some oscilloscope measurements, we found that one of the matrix switches wasn't generating pulses, which explained why the memory wasn't working. We started checking the signals going into the matrix switch and found one matrix switch input line showed some ringing, apparently enough to keep the matrix switch from functioning.

Since the CHM has two 1401 computers, we decided to swap cards with the good machine to track down the fault. First we tried swapping the thermal switch board (below). One problem with core memory is that the properties of ferrite cores change with temperature. Some computers avoid this problem by heating the core memory to a constant temperature in air (as in the IBM 1620 computer) or an oil bath (as in the IBM 7090). The 1401 on the other hand uses temperature-controlled switches to adjust the current based on the ambient temperature. We swapped the "AKB" thermal switch board (below) and the associated "AKC" resistor board, with no effect.

The core memory uses a thermal switch board to adjust the current through core memory as temperature changes. The switches open at 35°C, 29°C and 22°C. The type of the board (AKB) is stamped into the lower left of the board.

Next we tried swapping the "AQW" current source boards that control current through the matrix switches.6 We swapped these board and the 1401's memory started working. Replacing the original boards one at a time, we found the bad board, shown below.

The IBM 1401 has four "AQW" cards that generate currents for the core memory switches. This card had a faulty inductor (the upper green cylinder), preventing core memory from working.

I examined the bad board and tested its components with an multimeter. There were two 1.2mH inductors on the board (the large green cylinders). I measured 3 ohms across one and 3 megaohms across the other, indicating that the second inductor had failed. With an open inductor, the board would only provide half the current. This explained why the matrix switch wasn't generating pulses, and thus why the core memory didn't work.

I gave the bad inductor to Robert Baruch of Project 5474 for analysis. He found that the connection between the lead and the inductor wire was intermittent. He dissolved the inductor's package in acid and took photographs of the winding inside the inductor.7

The faulty inductor from the IBM 1401 showing the failed connection.

We looked in the spare board cabinet for an AQW board to replace the bad one and found several. However, the replacement boards were different from the original—they had one power transistor instead of two. (Compare the photo below with the photo of the failed card from the computer.)

The replacement AQW card had one transistor instead of two, but was supposedly compatible with the old board.

Despite misgivings from some team members, the bad AQW card was replaced with a one-transistor AQW card and we attempted to power the system back up. Relays clicked and fans spun, but the computer refused to power up. We put the old card back (after replacing the inductor), and the computer still wouldn't start. So now we had a bigger problem. Apparently something had gone wrong with the computer's power supplies so the debugging effort switched focus.

Diagnosing the power supply problem

The power supply system for the IBM 1401 is more complex than you might expect. Curiously, the main power supplies for the system are inside the card reader; a 1250W ferro-resonant transformer in the card reader regulates the line input AC to 130V AC, which is fed to the 1401 computer itself through a thick cable under the floor. Smaller power supplies inside the 1401 then produce the necessary voltages.

Since it was built before switching power supplies became popular, the IBM 1401 uses bulky linear power supplies. The photo below shows (left to right) the +30V, -6V, +6V and -12V supplies.8 In the lower left, under the +30V supply, you can see eight relays for power sequencing. The circuit board to the right of the relays is one of the "sense cards" that checks for proper voltages. Under the +6V supply is a small "+18V differential" supply for the core memory. Foreshadowing: these components will all be important later.9

Power supplies in the IBM 1401.

After measuring voltages on the multiple power supplies, the team concluded that the -6V power supply wasn't working right. This was a bit puzzling because the AQW card (the one we replaced) only uses +12 and +30 volts. Since it doesn't use -6 volts at all, I didn't see how it could mess up the -6 volt supply.

Inside the IBM 1401's -6V power supply.

The team removed the -6V supply and took it to the lab. In the photo above, you can see the heavy AC transformer and large electrolytic capacitors inside the power supply. Measuring the output transistors, they found one bad transistor and some weak transistors and decided to replace all six transistors. In the photo below, you can see the new transistors, mounted on the power supply's large heat sink. These are germanium power transistors; the whole computer is pre-silicon.

The -6V power supply from the IBM 1401 uses six power transistors on a large heat sink.

The -6V power supply tested okay in the lab with the new transistors, so it was installed back in the 1401. We hit the "Power On" button on the console and... it still didn't work. We still weren't getting -6V and the computer wouldn't power up.

In the next repair session, we tried to determine why the computer wasn't powering up. Recall the eight relays mentioned earlier; these relays provide AC power to the power supplies in sequence to ensure that the supplies start up in the right order. If there is a problem with a voltage, the next relay in the sequence won't close and the power-up process will be blocked. We looked at which relays were closing and which weren't, and measured the voltages from the various power supplies. Eventually we determined that about halfway through the power-up process, relay #1 was not closing when it should, stopping the power-up sequence.

Relay #1 was driven by the +30V supply and was activated by a "sense card" that checked the +6V supply. But the +30V and +6V supplies were powering up fine and the sense card was switching on properly. Thus, the problem seemed to be a failure with the relay itself. Just before we pulled out the relay for testing, someone found an updated schematic showing the relay didn't use the regular +30V supply but instead obtained its 30 volts through the "18V differential supply".11 And the schematic for the 18V differential supply had a pencilled-in fuse.10

Could the power problem be as simple as a burnt-out fuse? We opened up the 18V differential supply, and sure enough, there was a fuse and it was burnt out. After replacing the fuse, the system powered up fine and we were back in business.

The 18V differential power supply in the IBM 1401 provides 12 volts to the core memory. The fuse is under the large electrolytic filter capacitors.

With the computer operational, I could finally run my program. After a few bug fixes, my program used the computers's reader/punch to punch a card with a special hole pattern:

A punch card with "Merry Xmas" and a tree punched into it.

Happy holidays everyone!12

Conclusion

After all this debugging, what was the root cause of the problems? As far as we can tell, the original problem was the inductor failure and it's just a coincidence that the problem occurred after the power loss during system startup. The new AQW card must have caused the fuse to blow, although we don't have a smoking gun.13 The reason the -6V power supply wasn't showing any voltage is because it was sequenced by relay #1, which didn't close because of the fuse. The bad transistors in the -6V power supply problem were apparently a pre-existing and non-critical problem; the good transistors handled enough load to keep the power supply working. The moral from all this is that keeping an old computer running is challenging and takes a talented team.

Thanks to Robert Baruch for the inductor photos. Thanks to Carl Claunch for providing analysis. The Computer History Museum in Mountain View runs demonstrations of the IBM 1401 on Wednesdays and Saturdays so check it out if you're in the area; the demo schedule is here.

Follow me on Twitter or RSS to find out about my latest blog posts.

Notes and references

1. Although there are two IBM 1401 computers at the CHM, only one of them has the "column binary punch" feature that I needed. "Column binary" lets you punch arbitrary patterns on a punch card (to store binary) rather than being limited to the standard punch card character set of 64 characters. ↩

2. Note that the 1401 has 4000 characters of memory and not 4096 because it is a decimal machine. Also, the memory stores 6-bit characters plus a (metadata) word mark and not bytes. ↩

3. If you want to know more about the 1401's core memory, I've written in detail about core memory and described a core memory fix . ↩

4. The trick that makes core memory work is that the cores have extremely nonlinear magnetic characteristics. If you pass a current (call it I) through a wire through a core, the core will become magnetized in that direction. But if you pass a smaller current (I/2) through a wire, the core doesn't change magnetization at all. The result is that you can put cores on a grid of X and Y wires. If you put current I/2 through an X wire and current I/2 through a Y wire, the core at their intersection will get enough current to change state, while the rest of the cores will remain unchanged. Thus, individual cores can be selected. ↩

5. The matrix switch is another set of cores in a grid, but used to generate pulses rather than store data. The 1401's memory has 50 X lines and 80 Y lines (yielding 4000 addresses), so generating the X and Y pulses with transistors would require 50 + 80 expensive, high-current transistors. The X matrix switch has 5 row inputs and 10 column inputs, and 50 outputs—one from each core. The address is decoded to generate the current pulses for these 15 inputs. Thus, instead of using transistor circuits to decode and drive 50 lines, just 15 lines need to be decoded and driven, and the matrix switch generates the final 50 lines from these. The Y lines are similar, using a second matrix switch to drive the 80 Y lines. ↩

6. Each matrix switch has two current inputs (for the row select and the column select), so there are four current source boards and four current driver boards in total. ↩

7. Strangely, half the inductor is nicely wound while the winding in the other half is kind of a mess.

   ↩

   The faulty inductor from the IBM 1401.

8. The 1401 has more power supplies that aren't visible in the picture. They are behind the power supplies in the photo and slide out from the side for maintenance. ↩

9. If you want to see the original schematics and diagrams of the 1401's power supplies, you can find them here. Core memory schematics are here. ↩

10. The pencilled-in fused on the schematic also had a note about an IBM "engineering change". In IBM lingo, an engineering change is a modification to the design to fix a problem. Thus, it appears the the 1401 originally didn't have the fuse, but it was added later. Perhaps we weren't the first installation to have this problem, and the fuse was added to prevent more serious damage. ↩

11. The 18V differential supply provides 12 volts. This seemed contradictory, but there's an explanation. The core memory circuitry is referenced to +30 volts. It needs a supply 18 volts lower, which is provided by the 18V differential supply. Thus, the voltage is +12V above ground. Unlike the regular +12V power supply, however, the differential power supply's output will move with any changes to the +30V supply, ensuring the difference is a steady 18 volts. ↩

12. The "Merry Xmas" card was inspired by a tweet from @rrragan. (I had also designed a card with a menorah, but unfortunately encountered keypunch problems and couldn't get it completed in time. Maybe next year.) Punch cards normally encode characters by punching up to three holes per column. Since this decorative card required many holes per column, I needed to use the 1401's column binary feature, which allows arbitrary binary data to be punched. I ended up punching the card upside down to simplify the program:

    ↩

    Front of my "Merry Xmas" punch card.

13. After carefully examining the AQW boards, we determined that one- and two-transistor cards should be compatible. The two-transistor board had the two transistors in parallel, probably using earlier transistors that couldn't handle as much current. It's possible that the filter capacitor between +30V and ground was shorted in the replacement AQW board, blowing the fuse. ↩

Inside the vintage Xerox Alto's display, a tiny lightbulb keeps it working

In this Alto restoration episode, we repaired a second CRT display, exercising our TV repair skills and discovering a tiny mysterious lightbulb that caused the display to fail in a strange way. For those just tuning in, the Alto was a revolutionary computer designed at Xerox PARC in 1973 to investigate personal computing. It introduced the GUI, high-resolution bitmapped displays, WYSIWYG editors, Ethernet and laser printers to the world, among other things.

The YCombinator Xerox Alto, running a Mandelbrot set program I wrote in BCPL.

I've been restoring an Alto from YCombinator, along with Marc Verdiell, Carl Claunch and Luca Severini. Since we have the YCombinator Alto working (above), we've been trying trying to get a second Xerox Alto system running; this one is from DigiBarn. My full set of Alto posts is here and Marc's videos are here.

Inside the Alto's display

When we tried to connect the DigiBarn display to the Alto, we ran into a problem—it had an incompatible connector. Looking inside the display (below), we were surprised to find this connector led to a circuit board with a 6502 microprocessor; since the Alto came out in 1973 and the 6502 in 1975, this didn't make sense. After some investigation, I determined that although the display looked like an Alto display, it was actually for a Dorado, a Xerox minicomputer from 1979 that followed the Alto.

Inside the Xerox Alto's display. With the cover removed, the CRT and monitor circuitry are visible. The 7-wire interface board is at bottom-left. The Alto itself is in the cabinet under the display.

The Dorado was much faster than the Alto because the Dorado used ECL chips, the same technology used in the Cray-1 supercomputer. Unfortunately, since ECL chips used a lot of power and needed powerful cooling fans, the Dorado was too hot and noisy to use in an office. Putting a soundproof enclosure around the Dorado didn't work, so Xerox ended up putting Dorados in machine rooms. The user's keyboard, mouse and display was connected to the remote Dorado with a special cable using the "7-wire protocol" that Xerox invented for this purpose. The 6502 board was the interface for this protocol. 5

To connect the Alto to this display, I built an adapter cable that bypassed the 7-wire board. We hooked up the monitor, powered it on, and were greeted with a empty black screen. Given the age of the monitor, we weren't surprised that it didn't work. However, when we powered off the monitor, we saw a perfect image for a fraction of a second before the image collapsed to a dot and disappeared. This was unexpected—the monitor didn't work at all when powered on, but worked fine (but very briefly) when turned off! What could be going on?

How a CRT monitor works

Since many readers may not be familiar with how CRTs work, I'll take a brief detour and explain how CRTs work. The cathode ray tube (CRT) ruled television displays from the 1930s until LCD displays took over about 10 years ago.2 In a CRT, an electron beam is shot at a phosphor-coated screen, causing a spot on the screen to light up. The beam scans across the screen, left to right and top to bottom in a raster pattern. The beam is turned on and off, generating a pattern of dots on the screen to form the image. The horizontal scan will turn out to be very important to this repair.

The Xerox Alto's display uses an 875-line raster scan. (For simplicity, I'm ignoring interlacing of the raster scan.)

The cathode ray tube is a large vacuum tube containing multiple components, as shown below. A small electrical heater, similar to a light bulb filament, heats the cathode to about 1000°C. The cathode is an electrode that emits electrons when hot. A control grid surrounds the cathode; putting a negative voltage on the grid repels the negatively-charged electrons, reducing the beam strength and thus the brightness. The next grid has about 800 volts on it, attracting and accelerating the electrons. The focus grid, at about 600 volts, squeezes the electron beam to form a sharp spot. The anode is positively charged to a high voltage (17,000V), accelerating the electrons to hit the screen with high energy. The screen is coated with a phosphor, causing it to glow where hit by the electron beam. Finally, two electromagnets are arranged on the neck of the tube to deflect the beam horizontally and vertically in the raster scan pattern shown earlier; these are the deflection coils.

Diagram of a Cathode Ray Tube (CRT). Based on drawings by Interiot and Theresa Knott (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The photo below shows the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) inside the Alto's monitor, with the screen at the right. In the center, the red deflection coils are mounted on the neck of the tube. The thick red wire provides 17,000 volts to the anode. This high voltage is generated by the flyback transformer, the UFO-like gray disk in the lower left.

Inside the Xerox Alto's display, the CRT picture tube is visible. The thick red wire provides 17,000 volts from the flyback transformer to the tube's anode. The other red wire is connected to the 500MΩ 6W bleeder resistor, the large white cylinder at the left. Note the dirt and debris on the flyback transformer from the system's storage in a barn.

Back to the broken display

Why would the display work for a moment, just as it is powered off? It must have something to do with voltage levels dropping as the power supplies shut down—something that wasn't working at full voltage, but worked at a lower voltage. One theory was that one of the CRT grids might have the wrong voltage. Since electrons are negative, they are attracted to positive voltages (such as the 17,000 volt anode) and repelled by negative voltages. If a grid was too negative, the electron beam could be blocked. Perhaps as the power supplies shut down, the negative grid problem briefly resolved itself.3

We opened up the display and measured some voltages, taking extreme care around the high voltages. Verifying the 17,000 V supply was easy; with a voltage this high, waving an oscilloscope probe a few inches away is sufficient to pick up a signal (below). The main 55V supply was also good. But when we checked the grid voltages, we didn't get anything.

The service manual shows the waveform you can pick up two inches away from the flyback transformer.

The grid voltages and 17KV supply are generated by the flyback transformer. Since we saw the 17KV signal, we knew the horizontal deflection circuit and the flyback transformer were working. Perhaps a capacitor had failed, but we didn't find any bad ones. On the schematic we noticed a tiny lightbulb in the high-voltage circuit, an unexpected circuit element. We measured the bulb's resistance on the board (below) and found it was open. We figured the bulb must have burned out, but after removing it we discovered that instead one of the bulb's leads had broken off right at the glass case.

The bulb is visible in front of the right side of the transformer.

The service manual for the monitor called the bulb a "No. 1764." I was afraid that this was an internal part number and we wouldn't be able to determine the correct replacement bulb. However, Google revealed that this was a 28V 0.04A miniature bulb, sold by many vendors. Unfortunately we couldn't find any local stores that sold this bulb and we wanted to test out a fix immediately. So Marc performed some precision microscope soldering to reattach the broken wire. Since the wire had broken off right at the glass, reattaching it was very difficult but he succeeded. We re-installed the bulb and the display worked fine!

Why is there a bulb inside the power supply? I assume that it is used as a current limiter. Bulbs have very low resistance when cold, but increase resistance as they warm up. It seems crazy to subject a 28 V bulb to pulses of 600 volts, but since the pulses are only a few microseconds, the bulb survives them just fine.

The tiny bulb inside the display's power supply.

Details on the power supply

The high-voltage power supply is described in the monitor service manual, but I'll give a brief summary here.4

The primary purpose of the horizontal sync circuit is to create a sawtooth current through the horizontal deflection coil to scan left-to-right across each row of the screen. A common trick in TVs is to use the high-frequency (26 kHz) horizontal sync to generate high voltages. To do this, the horizontal sync circuit sends high-current pulses (2-3 amps) through the flyback transformer. This step-up transformer produces the 17 kilovolts required by the CRT's anode. A second transformer winding produces -100 volts, while the third winding is used to generate 600V and 1000V. (Interestingly, cell phone chargers also use flyback transformers, but obviously at much lower voltages.)

The photo below shows the flyback transformer (left). The thick black wire at the bottom of the photo connects the 17KV from the transformer to the picture tube, while the colorful wires at the top provide the lower voltages.

Flyback transformer inside the monitor. The large white cylinder is a 500 megaohm, 6W resistor. You don't usually see such a high resistance combined with a high wattage, but the resistor bleeds off the high voltage from the CRT.

The schematic below indicates the key components of the power supply. The switching transistor is driven by the horizontal sync input. When it switches on, current (red line) builds up in the flyback transformer, storing energy in the transformer's magnetic field. When the transistor switches off, this stored energy is released into the secondary windings, producing 17KV for the anode and -100V for the brightness grid. In addition, a 600V pulse is created across the primary. The pulse (yellow line) flows through the bulb and a diode, generating 600V for the focus grid. The voltage doubler circuit (circled in pink) generates 1000V for the second (accelerator) grid.

The high-voltage power supply is driven by the horizontal deflection circuit. The switching transistor puts 55 volts across the flyback transformer. When it switches off, the flyback transformer produces 17 kilovolts for the CRT anode, as well as powering the 600V, 1000V and -100V supplies.

Why did the display originally show a picture for a moment as it was powered off? With the bulb not working, the 800V acceleration grid and the focus grid didn't receive any voltage, but the brightness grid was still powered (since -100V comes from a different winding). My theory is that without the attraction from the acceleration grid, electrons couldn't get past the negative brightness grid. But when the brightness grid lost power, the electron beam was no longer blocked and could reach the screen, until everything else shut down moments later.

Conclusion

Cathode ray tubes were the dominant display technology until LCD displays took over about 10 years ago. Now, CRT TV repair is a retro activity, involving circuits such as horizontal deflection, video amplifiers, and high-voltage flyback transformers that were formerly well-known but are now more obscure.

We tracked down the display's problem to a tiny light bulb, an unusual component to find in a critical role in a high-voltage power supply. Surprisingly, despite being exposed to 600 volt pulses, the problem with this 28 volt bulb wasn't that it had burnt out, but that one of its tiny leads had broken. After repairing the bulb, the display worked fine. Unlike our previous display which had a very faint CRT, this one produced a crisp, bright image. Since we got the display working and didn't get any high-voltage shocks, I consider this a successful restoration session.

The repaired display shows a test pattern, generated by the crttest program. The screen is bright and sharp, but the horizontal centering still needed adjustment.

Thanks to the Living Computer Museums + Lab for providing the display test board. Thanks to Al Kossow and Bitsavers for the scanned service manual.

Notes and references

1. For more on the Alto's monitor, see my article from last year about restoring our first display. ↩

2. A computer monitor is essentially a television set, but without the tuner to select the desired channel from the antenna. In addition, televisions have circuitry to extract the horizontal sync, vertical sync and video signals from the combined broadcast signal. These three signals are supplied to the Alto monitor separately, simplifying the circuitry. ↩

3. I should admit that Marc and Carl had the right theory about the problem. My theory that the video input voltage might be too high didn't pan out. ↩

4. I didn't discuss the 55V supply that powers the monitor. It is a straightforward regulated linear power supply driven from the 120V AC input. I also also didn't explain how the horizontal deflection coil operates. it is driven by the same transistor as the flyback transformer, but uses a fairly complex inductor-capacitor resonance circuit to generate the scan across the screen. (The scan current is a sawtooth; a smooth scan left-to-right followed by a rapid retrace back to the left.) For a thorough discussion of how the display's power supply works, see page 3-4 of the service manual. ↩

5. The 7-wire interface used a 15-wire cable with standard DB-15 (serial port) connectors. It sent seven ECL signals as differential pairs, and used the remaining wire for ground. Calling it "7-wire" seems a bit misleading, since it used 15 wires in total. The board schematic is in the Dorado schematics page 159. The video signal was multiplexed across four of the signals; this reduced the bandwidth requirement by a factor of four. One signal was serial data; this transmitted the keyboard and mouse information. The remaining two signals were (apparently redundant) clocks. The protocol supported daisy-chaining, so multiple peripherals (such as a printer) could be connected.

   

   This 7-wire Terminal Interface board was used by Xerox PARC to connect a keyboard/display/mouse to a remote Dorado minicomputer

   The photo above shows the 7-wire terminal interface board inside the display. The large chips in the upper right are the 6532 "RIOT" I/O chip, the 6502 microprocessor, and a 2716 EPROM holding the code. The remaining chips are a mixture of TTL and ECL. At the bottom are connectors for 7-wire in, 7-wire out, and the keyboard. The connector to the monitor itself is in the upper center. ↩

Lacking safety features, cheap MacBook chargers create big sparks

You might wonder if it's worth spending $79 for a genuine MacBook charger when you can get a charger on eBay for under $15. You shouldn't get a cheap charger because they are often dangerous and lack safety features. In addition, they produce poor-quality power that isn't good for your laptop and may charge more slowly. I've written before about the safety problems with cheap chargers, but they say a picture is worth a thousand words, so here is why you shouldn't buy a cheap knockoff charger:

A knockoff MacBook charger emits large sparks if short-circuited. Genuine Apple chargers have safety features to protect against this.

If the connector comes in contact with something metal (a paperclip in this instance), it shorts out, creating a big spark. (Don't try this at home.) The genuine Apple charger (below) has safety features that protect against a short circuit. Shorting the connector on a genuine charger has no effect.

A genuine Apple MacBook charger has safety features that protect it from short circuits.

It's really hard to tell a genuine charger from a knockoff from the outside, since the knockoffs look just like the real thing. If you carefully read the text on this charger, you'll notice that "Apple" is missing. However, many knockoff chargers duplicate the text from a real charger, so often you can't tell if it is genuine or not just by looking. Big sparks, however, are a clear sign.

A cheap MacBook charger from eBay. Unlike most cheap chargers, this one doesn't claim to be an Apple charger, but just a "Replacement AC Adapter".

Why does a fake charger produce sparks, while a genuine one doesn't? The fake charger constantly outputs 20 volts, so if any metal shorts the connector, it produces a big spark with all its 85 watts of power. On the other hand, the genuine charger doesn't power up until it has been securely connected to the laptop for a full second. Until it is properly connected (details), it outputs a tiny amount of power (0.6 volts at 100µA) that can't produce a spark. To manage this, the genuine charger includes a powerful microcontroller (more powerful than the microprocessor in the original Macintosh by some measures). Since this processor increases the cost of the charger, knockoff chargers omit it, even though this makes the charger more dangerous.

As the photos below show, the cheap charger (left) omits as much as possible. On the other hand, the genuine Apple charger (right) is crammed full of components. Many of these components filter the power to provide higher-quality power to your laptop. The Apple charger also includes power factor correction, making the charger more efficient.

The cheap MacBook charger (left) omits most of the components found in a genuine Apple charger (right). The genuine charger includes more filtering, power factor correction (left), and a powerful microcontroller (board in upper right).

I've written in detail before about how chargers work, but I'll give a quick explanation here. The AC power comes in the red wires at the top and is converted to high-voltage DC (170V or 340V, depending on if you're in the US or Europe). A transistor (black component on left) chops the power into high-frequency pulses. The pulses create a changing magnetic field in the flyback transformer (large blue box), generating a high-current, low-voltage output. The output is converted to DC by diodes (black component, upper right), and filtered by capacitors (cylinders), to produce the 20 volt output (wires at bottom). A control IC (see photo below) controls the system to regulate the voltage. This may seem like an excessively complicated way to generate 20 volts, but switching power supplies like this are very compact, lightweight and efficient compared to simpler power supplies.

Shorting a cheap charger with a paperclip creates impressive sparks.

Looking at the underside of the cheap charger board shows it has very few components, while the genuine Apple charger's board is covered with tiny components. The two chargers are worlds apart as far as complexity, and this complexity is what provides more efficiency, more safety, and better quality power in the Apple charger.

The cheap MacBook charger (left) uses very simple circuits compared to the genuine Apple charger (right), which is crammed full of components.

Conclusion

While buying a cheap charger saves a lot of money, these chargers omit many safety features and can be hazardous to you and your computer. Don't buy a cheap knockoff charger; if you don't want to pay for a genuine Apple charger, at least buy a charger from a name-brand manufacturer.

Maybe you think these safety issues don't matter because you don't poke your charger with a paperclip. But if you have any metal objects on your desk, a random contact could yield a surprisingly large spark.

I've written a bunch of articles before about chargers, so if this article seems familiar, you're probably thinking of an earlier article, such as: Counterfeit MacBook charger teardown, Magsafe charger teardown, iPhone charger teardown or iPad charger teardown.

Follow me on Twitter to find out about my new articles.

Notes

If you're interested in the components inside the cheap charger, I have some details. The PWM control IC is a SiFirst 1560, a basic control IC for a flyback converter. The IC datasheet has the approximate schematic for the charger. The switching transistor is a 2N601 2 amp, 600 volt N-channel MOSFET. The voltage reference is an AZ431, similar to the ubiquitous TL431. The optoisolator is an 817C. The output diode is a MBRF20100C 10 amp Schottky diode pair. The electrolytic capacitors are from HKLCON.

A cheap charger emits large sparks if you short the connector with a paperclip. Safety features in a genuine charger protect against shorts.

Restoring Y Combinator's Xerox Alto, day 1: Power supplies and disk interface

A few days ago, I wrote about how I'm helping restore a Xerox Alto for Y Combinator. This new post describes the first day of restoration: how we disassembled the computer and disk drive and fixed a power supply problem, but ran into a showstopper problem with the disk interface.

The Xerox Alto was a revolutionary computer from 1973, designed by computer pioneer Chuck Thacker at Xerox PARC to investigate ideas for personal computing. The Alto was the first computer built around a mouse and GUI, as well as introducing Ethernet and laser printers to the world. The Alto famously inspired Steve Jobs, who used many of its ideas in the Lisa and Macintosh computer.

Alan Kay, whose vision for a personal computer guided the Alto, recently gave an Alto computer to Y Combinator. Getting this system running again is a big effort but fortunately I'm working with a strong team, largely from the IBM 1401 restoration team. Marc Verdiell, Luca Severini, Ron, Carl Claunch, and I started on restoration a few days ago, as shown in Marc's video below.

Disassembling the Alto

We started by disassembling the computer. The Xerox Alto has a metal cabinet about the size of a dorm mini-fridge, with a Diablo hard disk drive on top, and a chassis with power supplies and the circuit boards below. With some tugging, the chassis slides out of the cabinet on rails as you can see in the photo below. At the front are the four cooling fans, normally protected by a decorative panel. Note the unusual portrait layout of the display.

The Xerox Alto II XM 'personal computer'. The card cage below the disk drive has been partially removed. Four cooling fans are visible at the front of it.

With the chassis fully removed, you can see the four switching power supplies on the left, the blue metal boxes. The computer's circuit boards are on the right, not visible in this picture. The wiring for the backplane is visible at right front, with pins connected by wire-wrapped wire connections. This wiring connects the circuit boards together.[1]

The Alto's chassis has been removed. On the left are the four switching power supplies (blue boxes). On the right, the connections for the wire-wrapped backplane are visible. The circuit boards plug into this backplane.

The power supplies

Our first goal was to make sure the power supplies worked after decades of sitting idle. The Alto uses high-efficiency switching power supplies.[2] To explain the power supplies in brief, input power is chopped up thousands of times a second to produce a regulated voltage. Unlike modern computer power supplies, there's a second switching stage (the inverter), which drops the voltage to the desired 15 volts. This was more complexity than I expected, but fortunately the detailed power supply manual was available online, thanks to Al Kossow's bitsavers.[3] We tested each power supply with a resistor as a dummy load and checked that the output voltage was correct. We also used an oscilloscope to make sure the output was stable. All the power supplies worked fine, except for the +15V supply (top center), which had trouble getting up to 15 volts and staying there.

We disassembled the faulty power supply to track down the problem. The photo of the power supply below shows how densely components are crammed into the power supply. Two of the circuit boards have been removed and are at the back. Note the three large filter capacitors at the front.

Switching power supply from the Xerox Alto computer. Two of the control boards have been removed and are visible at back.

We noted signs of overheating on the AC connector, as well as a somewhat sketchy looking repair (a trace replaced by a wire) and some signs of corrosion. Apparently the power supply had problems in the past and had been serviced. We cleaned up the corrosion and it appeared to be superficial.

The power supply disassembled easily for repair, as you can see below. The main board is at the right. The tower of three inductors on the main board is an unusual way of mounting inductors. Three circuit boards (top) plug into the main board. Because the power supply uses discrete components instead of a modern SMPS control IC, it needs a lot of control circuitry. The switching transistors (lower center) are mounted onto metal heat sinks for cooling.

The Alto's switching power supply, disassembled. The main board is in the lower right. The three circuit boards are at top, below the large input capacitors.

The large capacitors were attached with screws, making it easy to remove them for testing. A capacitance meter showed that the three large capacitors had failed, explaining why the power supply had trouble outputting the desired voltage. Ron went off and found replacement capacitors, although they weren't an exact match for the originals. With the new capacitors mounted in place, the power supply worked properly.

Inside the Diablo disk drive

We also looked at the Diablo disk drive, which provides 2.5MB of storage for the Xerox Alto. The first step was removing the disk pack. In normal operation, the front of the drive is locked shut to keep the disk from being removed during use. To remove the disk without powering up the drive, we had to open the drive and manually trip the latch that locks it shut (see Diablo drive manual).

This picture shows the disk pack being reinserted into the drive. Unlike modern hard disk drives, the Alto's disk can be removed from the drive. Users typically used different disks for different tasks — a programming disk, a word processing disk, and so forth. The disk pack is a fairly large white package, resembling a cross between an overgrown Frisbee and a poorly-detailed Star Wars spaceship. The drive's multiple circuit boards are also visible in the photo.[4]

Inserting a 2.5 MB hard disk pack into the Diablo drive used by the Xerox Alto computer.

As the disk pack enters the drive, it opens up to provide access to the disk surface. The photo below shows the exposed surface of the disk, brownish from the magnetizable iron oxide layer over the aluminum platter. The read/write head is visible above the disk's surface, with another head below the disk. The disk stores data in 203 concentric pairs of tracks, with the heads moving in and out together to access each pair of tracks.

Closeup of the hard disk inside the Diablo drive. The read/write head (metal/yellow) is visible above the disk surface (brown).

Although the heads are widely separated during disk pack insertion, they move very close to the disk surface during operation, floating about one thousandth of a millimeter above the surface. The diagram below from the manual helps visualize this minute distance, and illustrates the danger of particles on the disk's surface.

The Diablo disk and why contaminants are bad, from the Alto disk manual.

The disk interface cliffhanger

The final activity of the day was making sure all the Alto's circuit boards were in the right slots and the cables were all hooked up properly.[5] Everything went smoothly until I tried to hook up the Diablo disk drive to the disk interface card: the disk drive cable didn't fit on the card's connector!

The cable to the Alto disk didn't fit onto the disk interface card!

After trying various combinations of cables and edge connectors, we discovered that the rainbow-colored ribbon cable you can see in the lower right above did fit the disk interface card. But instead of going to the Diablo disk drive, this cable went to a connector on the back of the Alto labeled "Tricon". Tricon is the controller for the Trident Disk, a high-capacity disk drive that could be used with the Alto, providing 80 MB instead of the just 2.5 MB that the standard Diablo drive provides. Looking at the disk interface card more closely, we saw it was labeled "Alto II Trident Disk Interface" (upper left corner of the photo below), confirming that it was for the Trident.

Trident Disk Interface card for Xerox Alto computer. (See label in upper left.)

It was a shock to discover the disk interface card was for the Trident drive, since our Alto has the standard Diablo drive, which is completely incompatible with the Trident.[6] We checked all the boards and verified that the system was missing the Diablo interface board. This was a showstopper problem; with the wrong board, the disk drive would be unusable and we wouldn't be able to boot up the system. What could we do? Network boot the Alto? Build a disk simulator? Find a Trident drive on eBay? (We actually found a Trident disk platter on eBay for $129, but no drive.)

Tune in next episode to find out what we did about the disk interface problem. (Spoiler: we found a solution thanks to Al Kossow.)

Notes and references

[1] The physical layout of the power supplies is specified on page 11 of the Alto documentation introduction. On the top are three Raytheon/Sorensen power supplies, +12V (15A), +15V (12A), and -15V (12A). At the bottom is a large LH Research Mighty Mite power supply providing +5V (60A) and -5V (12A).

Why the variety of voltages? Most of the circuitry in the Alto uses 5V, which is standard for TTL chips. The MOS memory chips use +5V, -5V and +12V. The Ethernet card uses +15V and -15V, with +15V powering the transceiver. The disk drive uses +/- 15V.

[2] Steve Jobs claimed that the Apple II's use of a switching power supply was a revolutionary idea ripped off by other computer manufacturers. However, the Alto is just one of many computers that used switching power supplies before Apple (details).

[3] For full details on the power supply operation, see the block diagram. First, the 115V AC line input is converted to 300V DC by a rectifier and voltage doubler. (The voltage doubler is a clever way of supporting both 115V and 230V inputs; using the doubler with 115V. This is why older PCs have a switch on the power supply to select 115V or 230V. Modern power supplies handle a wide input range, and don't require a switch.) Next, the power supply has a chopper, a PWM transistor circuit that chops up the 300V DC, producing a regulated 120V-200V DC, depending on the output load. This goes to the inverter, which drives a step-down/isolation transformer that produces the desired 15V output. A regulation circuit sends feedback to the chopper based on the output voltage. Meanwhile, an entirely separate switching power supply circuit generates voltages (including +150V) used by the power supply internally.

Modern power supplies use a single switching stage in place of the separate chopper and inverter. I believe the two stages were used to reduce the load on the bipolar switching transistors, which don't have the performance of modern MOSFET switching transistors. (As Ron pointed out, modern power supplies often have a PFC (power factor correction) stage for improved efficiency. Thus, the two-stage design has returned, although the stages are entirely different now.)

Modern power supplies use a power supply control IC. The Alto's power supply instead has control circuits built from simple components: transistors, op amps, 555 timers. This is one reason the power supply requires three circuit boards.

[4] The following table from the Alto disk manual gives the stats for the drive.

Statistics on the Diablo 31 disk used with the Xerox Alto computer.

[5] The Alto backplane has 21 slots, not all of which are used in our system. The list of which board goes into which slot is on page 8 of the Alto documentation.

[6] I suspect that the Y Combinator Alto originally had both a Trident drive and a Diablo drive (as well as four Orbit boards to drive a laser printer), and when it was taken out of service, the Trident drive, the Diablo interface board, and the Orbit boards went off somewhere else. This left the Alto with a drive that didn't match the interface card.

For reference, schematics and documentation on the Trident interface board are here. Despite all the chips on the disk interface board, it doesn't do very much, since each TTL chip is fairly simple. The interface board has some counters, one word data buffers, parallel/serial conversion, and a bit of control logic. The Alto was designed to offload many hardware tasks to microcode, so the hard work of disk I/O is performed in microcode (software).

Counterfeit Macbook charger teardown: convincing outside but dangerous inside

What's inside a counterfeit Macbook charger? After my Macbook charger teardown, a reader sent me a charger he suspected was counterfeit. From the outside, this charger is almost a perfect match for an Apple charger, but disassembling the charger shows that it is very different on the inside. It has a much simpler design that lacks quality features of the genuine charger, and has major safety defects.

Inside a counterfeit MagSafe 45W charger.

The counterfeit Apple chargers I've seen in the past have usually had external flaws that give them away, but this charger could have fooled me. The exterior text on this charger was correct, no "Designed by Abble" or "Designed by California". It had a metal ground pin, which fakes often exclude. It had the embossed Apple logo on the case. The charger isn't suspiciously lightweight. Since I've written about these errors in fake chargers before, I half wonder if the builders learned from my previous articles. One minor flaw is the serial number sticker (to the right of the ground pin) was a bit crooked and not stuck on well.

This counterfeit MagSafe 45W charger has the same 'Designed by Apple in California' text as the genuine charger. Unlike many fakes, it has a metal ground pin (although it isn't connected internally). To the right of the ground pin, the serial number label is a bit crooked, which is a hint that something isn't right.

The photo below shows the safety certifications that the charger claims to have. Again, it looks genuine, with no typos or ugly fonts.

The counterfeit power supply has all the same safety indications as a real power supply.

One flaw that made the original purchaser suspicious was the quality of the case didn't seem up to Apple standards. It didn't feel quite like his old charger when tapped, and the joints appear slightly asymmetrical, as you can see in the picture below.

The seams in a counterfeit Magsafe power supply are a bit asymmetrical.

A problem showed up when I plugged in the charger and measured the output at the Magsafe connector. I measured 14.75 volts output and got a spark when I shorted the pins. Since the charger is rated at 14.85 volts, this may seem normal, but the behavior of a real charger is different. A Magsafe charger initially produces a low-current output of 3 to 6 volts, so shorting the output should not produce a spark. Only when a microcontroller inside the charger detects that the charger is connected to a laptop does the charger switch to the full output power. (Details are in my Magsafe connector teardown article.) This is a safety feature of the real charger that reduces the risk from a short circuit across the pins. The counterfeit charger, on the other hand, omits the microcontroller circuit and simply outputs the full voltage at all times. This raises the risk of burning out your laptop if you plug the connector in crooked or metallic debris sticks to the magnet.

Inside the charger

Cracking the charger open with a chisel reveals the internal circuitry. A real Apple charger is packed full of complex circuitry, while this charger had a fairly low density board that implemented a simple flyback switching power supply.

A view of the counterfeit MagSafe charger with the case and heat sink removed.

The circuit is a fairly standard flyback power supply. To understand how it works, look at the diagram below, going counterclockwise from the AC input on the right. After going through a fuse, the power is converted to DC by a bridge rectifier. The large filter capacitor smooths out the DC. Next, the switching transistor chops the DC into pulses, which are fed into the flyback transformer. The transformer's low-voltage output is converted back to DC by the output diode. The output filter capacitors smooth the DC output.

The counterfeit Magsafe power supply uses a standard flyback switching power supply circuit. AC enters at the right and is converted to DC. The switching transistor sends pulses into the flyback transformer (center), which produces the low voltage output (left).

A TL431A voltage reference generates a feedback signal from the output, which is fed to the control IC through the optoisolator. While this circuit may seem complex, it's pretty standard for a simple charger. A genuine Macbook charger on the other hand has a much more complex circuit, as I describe in my teardown.

The charger is controlled by a tiny 6-pin IC on the underside of the board. It switches the MOSFET on and off at the proper rate (about 60 kilohertz) to generate the desired output voltage. The control IC is labeled "63G01 415", but I couldn't find any chip that matches that description. (Update: a clever reader identified the chip as the OB2263.)

Closeup of the tiny control IC inside a counterfeit MagSafe 45W power supply.

What's wrong with this charger

The most important feature of a charger is the isolation between the potentially-dangerous AC input and the low-voltage output. High voltage and low voltage should be separated by a safety gap of at least 4mm (to simplify the UL's creepage and clearance rules). On the circuit board below, the high voltage input section is at the bottom and the low voltage output section is at the top. On the right half of the board, the two sections are separated by a large gap, which is good. On the left, there should be a gap (bridged by the optoisolator). Unfortunately, traces and components pass through this area making the gap dangerously small, under 1 mm. Any moisture or loose solder could bridge this gap sending high voltage to the output.

The counterfeit MagSafe charger has a dangerously small distance between the low voltage side (top) and the high voltage side (bottom). This is why you shouldn't buy counterfeit chargers.

I'm puzzled as to why counterfeit chargers never manage to have sufficient clearance distances. They use simple, low-complexity circuits so the circuit board layout should be straightforward. Except in the smallest cube phone chargers, they aren't fighting for every millimeter of space. It shouldn't take much additional effort to make the boards safer.

The second safety flaw is the heat sink that provides cooling for the input-side MOSFET and the output-side diode. The heat sink is basically a giant conductor between the two sides of the circuit, with only small gaps separating it from active parts of the circuit.

As well as having large creepage and clearance distances between high and low voltages, genuine chargers also make extensive use of insulating tape for separation. The counterfeit charger lacks extra insulation, except heat-shrink tubing around the fuse and fusible resistor. I didn't disassemble the transformer, but I expect it also lacks the necessary insulation.

The counterfeit charger has a metal ground pin (unlike other fakes I've seen that have a plastic pin). However, the pin is just for appearance and is not connected to anything.

The photo below compares the underside of the counterfeit 45W charger (left) with a genuine Apple 60W charger (right). As you can see, the counterfeit has a simple circuit board with just a few parts, while the genuine charger is crammed full of parts. The two boards are in totally different worlds of design complexity. The additional parts provide better power quality and improved safety in the real charger; this is part of the reason genuine chargers are significantly more expensive.

Comparison of a counterfeit MagSafe 45W charger (left) and a genuine 60W charger (right). The genuine charger is crammed full of components, while the counterfeit just has a few components.

Quality of the power

I measured the output power from the counterfeit charger with an oscilloscope, while drawing 15 watts. As you can see below, the output power is not smooth, but has pairs of large spikes when the switching transistor turns on and off. The charger operates at a frequency of about 60 kilohertz. More filtering inside the charger reduces these voltage spikes, but would cost more.

The switching power supply operates at about 60 kilohertz, producing large voltage spikes in the output. You can see a spike when the transistor switches on, followed by another spike when it switches off.

The oscilloscope trace below zooms in on one of the spikes. You can see that the spike measures 2.7 volts peak-to-peak, which is a lot of noise to be feeding into your laptop.

The output of the counterfeit charger has large 2.7V noise spikes when a transistor switches internally.

Conclusion

This counterfeit Magsafe charger is convincing from the outside, with more attention to detail than most. Until I opened it up, I wasn't completely sure that it was counterfeit. But on the inside, the difference between the counterfeit and real chargers is clear. The counterfeit has a much simpler circuit that provides poorer-quality power. It also ignores safety requirements with less than a millimeter separating you and your computer from a dangerous shock. While counterfeit chargers are much cheaper, they are also dangerous to you and your computer. Thanks to Richard S. for providing the charger.

I've written a bunch of articles before about chargers, so if this article seems familiar, you're probably thinking of an earlier article, such as: Magsafe charger teardown, iPhone charger teardown or iPad charger teardown.

You can follow me on Twitter and find out about my new articles.

Notes

For those who care about the component details, the MOSFET is a 600V, 7.5A transistor from Fairchild (FQPF8N60C datasheet). The optoisolator is a Kento JC817 (datasheet). The output diode is a NAMC MBRF10100CT 10A 100V Schottky barrier rectifier. I was unable to identify the control IC, which is marked with "63GO1 415". The Y capacitor (blue) is JNC JN472M 250V 4.7nF capacitor.